Everyone believes that the PS is responsible for the debt in emptying the coffers of the state but the reality is quite different. The Did You Know? Debt fell under Jospin and Raffarin has exploded / Villepin / Sarkozy historical source of debt from 1996 to 2006: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dette_publique_de_la_France another source that shows an explosion clear-cut in 1993 under the action of Balladur and Budget Minister Balladur source => site Senate: http://www.senat.fr/rap/r98-413/r98-4130.html # ToC3 So why does this one left that empty boxes when it corrects the errors of the right ? It is true that this has increased fortemetn in 1983 and 1984 but in 1986-1988 under Chirac and CO. I'm not saying that there is gauhce for anything I say jsute q'elle did better than others! "I put a new link Accessed http://www.syti.net/Images/DettePubliqueFrancaise.jpg
Finally truths, Thanks …
+ 33% between 2002 and 2006, can not do better?
All those who agreed to finance the borrowing costs of operation while the loan should be reserved for capital expenditures and research. Basically: all ministers who have agreed to grovel before the public service unions. Jospin has done well by having Fabius when he agreed to spend the famous "kitty" that never existed.
Uncle and elephants of the time!
I think we're all a bit responsible …
You forgot LOOOOOOL 1981-1996 ……. and debt under Jospin has not declined (in% yes but not in euros)
good view and from 81 you saw or you made the ostrich the ostrich I think
The debt was created in 30 years. Under the leadership of the right and the left.
We are all responsible
> and debt under Jospin has not declined (in% yes but> non-euro) You've taken the time to look at the link? amounts in euros However, it should also have the amounts in%, and since 1981. FYI, the last budget financial balance of the 5th Republic was signed by Raymond Barre in 1981. All budgets since 1981 without exception were in operating deficit.
Looooooooooooool source history begins in 1996? Nay: debt at the beginning of seven Mitterrand was 34 billion euros (equivalent constant). This amount was consecutive to oil shocks. This is being said the amount was ridiculous. Today she is 1 200 billion euros, when we speak of falling or an explosion or Jospin Raffarin, there is something explode … laughing. The only thing we can say right and left, cohabitation or not, it was nullissime in the management of France.
It should not be any simpler: do not forget that corporate political action yesterday and will have consequences today and tomorrow. Not necessarily responsible for the Governement to power during which the debt has increased. Rather analyze what were the measures that have generated debt or those who have not been taken. These same measures (or non-actions) which grows heavy weight year after year such as the increase Recipients of CMU, the 35h, the increasing weight of special pension regimes unreformed and so on … Do not be a vision as short as the propaganda that you are served
And the fact that budgets for 2002 have voted in 2001? And the fact that debt is represented by its share in GDP, not its actual value? (and thus is directly influenced by growth) is curious as can be told anything by figures showing as desired. Not true, the debt has never declined since the budget surplus was not under Jospin. This is shown in your not even on the table gives the values in euro. Bravo misinformation. You can also say "the right is responsible for the tsunami, because there was no under Jospin" if you want.
Keep a cool link to get an idea visually. Http://www.syti.net/Images/DettePubliqueFrancaise.jpg Otherwise, it is logical that those who want to cut taxes must find the money elsewhere, so right! It is also logical that those who want to increase the number of officials must find more money! So both sides bear some responsibility.
Repart see Wikippedia. Further down, there is a table showing that Giscard is left with a positive deficit. And then Mitterrand created the first hole. Then, 88-90, it settles. And 90 to 95 it off again thoroughly. They must be bad habits on the public deficit to Mitterand. Now, they'll all offer programs beyond our means.
It was not me Sir, is the other !!!!!!
Related Blogs
- London « Sofus Skjærlund
- Jordbær Julep | DrinksMeister - Drinksopskrifter, Cocktails …
- Ny Cider test - Kan man smage hvad der er i? | DrinksMeister …
Tags: dette
