This solution hammered and proposed among others by Nicolas Sarkozy to finally address this abysmal debt. Is this the right solution? Officials are they responsible for the debt? Is there not a risk to divide the nation? Are there other avenues?
We must reduce the operating budget of the state: otherwise, we can invest more. Nécessaireemnt This requires a Reduta the number of employees and / or freeze their wages for several years. Moreover, a certain Laurent Fabius had begun to implement this policy in 1983.
The problem is that in saying this, he does not get wet that much …. It is not clear in which sectors of the public, it will make cuts? In Education in the Admnistration in police, justice …..???? We do not know! "
Yes! Twice fewer teachers, nurses, police, policemen, judges, etc … And if at the same time, it gave a boost to trade in weapons like the USA? .. . it would be good for economic growth!
The national debt is largely due to its operation (salaires. ..) and not to investment. When a company wants to improve his situation, it attacks the fixed charges and including the payroll. This suggests that Sarkozy knowing that Canada, Sweden and other countries have done before us and those countries have growth rates much higher than ours.
the nation is already divided for us not to hurt your feelings
another track 1 / 3 and explain to staff that the office is before them, it is not to play cards, or to ask executives of photos of their relatives, but to work.
why when he was minister he has not reduced his salary and that of his friends, was not a good start when one wants to talk about the state debt! and that's a good solution , delete a post on both. and then after that we will complain when there will be no one to serve us! the slayer: Can you tell me that foresee the Robien law?? Of course we can employ once you have deleted the posts, is not it a bit easy! to view your comment, it's not just the Governement sarko. the president's salary is how much for example? and expenditures of elysees too? but it's true that it goes into the government and that increases the salaries of all members of 70% is nothing!
It depends what officials? For there will always be teachers, cops, doctors, nurses, prison guards, etc. … Reducing costs in the sweet "golden parachutes" that are granted the deputies, it would not have a good Departure?
If only officials were responsible for the debt, it is not. And how to ensure a quality public service and equal for all (ie. regardless of income), notammment health by removing these officials? M. Sarkozy has already set foot in a public hospital?? Or school PTA with 25 students per class in which half CE2 can not read?? Course must be modernized, but every body, every region, I would say each structure has its own peculiarities that must be taken into account anyway if you want to keep this quality of service that the world envies us. Otherwise delete as all public services and not replace any employee as an 'to do … This would be a much more logical to follow the trail of Mr Sarkozy.
It is especially impossible. It is already short of staff in hospitals, in justice, in education or in the national police. We can make savings on staff in local authorities and is probably just about everything . Well, it is still a number of posts, but surely not the 250,000 announced. The risk is that it continues as the present government to remove posts everywhere. That's how nurses are found to be I do not know how many hours per week and classes are overcrowded in schools. If you want to recover the money, we began by removing councils ! There are a number of elected unnecessary, because the skills of those boards are so reduced that it became possible to completely transfer to municipalities or regions. And in another vein, we tax the big companies making record profits and do not reinvest (eg Total, more. And in another vein, we tax the big companies making record profits and do not reinvest (eg Total, over 12 billion profit this year, half of which used to buy back its … own actions "outrageous).
This is an excellent idea. 70 students per class. 4 hours waiting for emergencies instead of 2 hours. Two times less cops on the street. A court two times slower. mail every other day (There is already the case) … Unless we replace all these people by private companies: two times more expensive.
Sure, it's hard for officials, it seems to detract from their role and their work. Officials are not responsible for the debt. But the proportion of state budget is spent on payments for civil servants is very important. As in many cases there is a risk of dividing the nation and we must explain. Of course we must look at other tracks, but they can be a complement.
If we could have enough imagination to know the incredible sums that politicians have managed to divert it could last guess is perhaps why the national debt is so great! Then we will have no suspicions about our staff, our rmistes our beneficiaries who all together should not cost the millionth of what we cost policies. Do not you ever wondered why they passed 30 years of their lives trying to get the tickets of Ministers, Deputies, President? The Power, the main power to release public funds for a particular tender … I sincerely believe, but I can be near plate …
At the time or the most profitable businesses relocate and lay off, consumption based entirely on French officials and the public services. Indeed deal with uncertainties about the future that can take credits for consumption or vacation of three days to turn tourism to Mount St. Michel in Paris or the Loire Valley .. The public is the final guarantor of the country. They ensure the continuity of public services (doctors, schools, power of order) They allow a mixing of the population because c is the only employer who s tried not to discriminate in the hiring. I am not official but I said that the deficit of the social security is a blessing indeed that s interresse a countries with rich people in poor health? Pharmaceutical companies are of excellent financial results must preserve public services for rural areas L UMP led France to the brink of bankruptcy 60 billion of debt in 2004 (24. I am not official but I said that the deficit of the social security is a blessing indeed that s interresse a country with rich people in poor health? Pharmaceutical companies are of excellent financial results must preserve public services for The rural areas UMP led France to the brink of bankruptcy 60 billion of debt in 2004 (24milliards in 2001) and today they tell us that we must make sacrifices … Hervé Gaymard to the air to thrive
Just a caveat: he has actually done this, but then, he has developed and clarified. it would be several years (already!), with a big party on bercy and this type of administration (note, I hear already irritated others and criticize Sarkozy). there is no question, for example, reduce teacher drastically, ditto for health: there is even talk to these 2 sectors to hire. in However, there are many positions in government (which we do not see) to be (and are sometimes already) unnecessary. you know there are thousands of people to taxes that are still there even though they were for the road tax (which no longer exists)? So maybe we can eliminate a large number of officials, even though we had the air of a national tragedy. It is true that the officials cost of any even money, and plus, I really think the retirement age is discussed. for the trades so that "risk", it suffices to establish an age. For the trades so that "risk", it suffices to establish a âgelimite for "forehead" and spend the rest in an office (it's useful too!). But this is not normal that requires private more pay for public pensions. PS: for info, the salary of a minister of the interior is 11 K €. I do not think it's whopping (in response to a note read above) in view of taf …
Related Blogs
SMEs suffer from excessive loads on-the Movers & Europe. A few liberal "oriented jobs" would be rather beneficial. The debt is more the result of policy "by announcement effect "(like, we'll give them both to them to calm public opinion), without any substantive achievement. As unemployment ….